Registry open Standard v1.0 in force · next review July 2027
Governance · Independent standards body

Who owns the Standard

The Foundation holds the Body of Knowledge, the examination, the accreditation criteria and the marks. It licenses delivery and it never sells influence over content. This page sets out the structure, the people, the review cycle and the documents — including the seats not yet filled.

Read the charter See the Consortium seats
Registered AI Passport Foundation Ltd · England & Wales
Standard in force v1.0 · JULY 2026
Council quorum 4 of 6 chairs · two-thirds to publish
Appointments In progress — 9 seats open
Held centrally · never franchised
Body of Knowledge

Six domains, versioned in public. Every competency statement carries a named author and reviewer.

The examination

Item banks, psychometrics and pass marks are set centrally. A licensee invigilates; it never writes questions.

Accreditation criteria

The bar for licensees, centres and trainers — audited on schedule and unannounced, revocable for breach.

The marks & the register

The seal, the name and the public record. Grades are conferred by the Foundation alone.

Structure

Four layers, one direction of authority

Authority runs downward and evidence runs upward. A national licensee can assess candidates and report results; it cannot alter a competency, set a pass mark, or confer a grade. That separation is the whole basis of the credential's value.

Where a body sits in this diagram determines what it may sign. Nothing is delegated informally, and no commercial relationship carries a vote.

Board of Trustees
Final accountability

Holds the assets and the marks, appoints the Council, and cannot vote on the content of the Standard.

Steering Council

The six domain chairs. Holds the final vote on every version of the Standard and on every pass mark.

The Consortium

50+ academics and senior practitioners, sitting in a personal capacity. Authors and reviews on a three-year cycle.

National licensees & centres

Deliver, teach and invigilate under accreditation. No vote, no content rights, no power to award.

The Consortium

Six domain chairs, three practice seats

Each domain of the Body of Knowledge is chaired. The chairs sit together as the Steering Council; three co-opted seats cover assessment science, public-sector adoption and industry practice.

D1
Chair
Foundations of AI

How models work, what they cannot do, and the vocabulary the rest of the Standard depends on.

Seat open · appointment in progress
D2
Chair
Prompting & interaction

Instructing, iterating and critiquing model output — assessed on transcripts, not on recall.

Seat open · appointment in progress
D3
Chair
Data & evidence

Sourcing, provenance, verification and the discipline of not publishing what you cannot check.

Seat open · appointment in progress
D4
Chair
Risk, ethics & law

Duties, liability and refusal. Mapped per jurisdiction — EU AI Act duties are mapped here.

Seat open · appointment in progress
D5
Chair
Applied workflow

Rebuilding real work with AI in it, and measuring whether the result is actually better.

Seat open · appointment in progress
D6
Chair
Governance & oversight

Policy, procurement, assurance and the controls an organisation must hold to deploy responsibly.

Seat open · appointment in progress
Co-opted seats Non-domain · advisory to the Council
Assessment & psychometrics

Guards item quality, pass marks and comparability across languages and cohorts.

Seat open
Public-sector adoption

Keeps the Standard usable inside civil-service grading and national skills frameworks.

Seat open
Industry practice

Senior practitioners who keep the competencies honest against how the work is really done.

Seat open

Seats are shown unfilled deliberately. The chairs above are the standing structure. Members are named here only once appointed, with their terms on the record — we publish no affiliation we have not earned.

Membership & terms of reference
Review cycle

How a version of the Standard is passed

A full review runs on a three-year cycle, with interim change notes between. Nothing enters the Standard without a named author, a named reviewer from another domain, and a recorded Council vote.

01
Draft

Domain working groups draft competency statements against evidence of practice.

02
Cross-review

Every statement is reviewed by a member of a different domain, and by the assessment seat.

03
Public comment

Six weeks open to holders, licensees, employers and ministries. Responses published with the version.

04
Council vote

Two-thirds of the six chairs to publish. Dissent is minuted, named and published.

05
Change note

What was added, retired or re-weighted — so holders know exactly what renewal will cover.

3
Year full review cycle
6
Weeks of public comment per version
24
Month validity of a Passport, by design
0
Vendor seats on the Council
Neutrality & conflicts of interest

Independence is a rule, not a promise

The Standard names capabilities, never products. Members sit in a personal capacity, declare their interests on appointment and again each cycle, and recuse themselves from any decision touching an employer or client. Declarations are public for the length of a term.

The four standing rules
01
No vendor may fund a domain
Authoring and review are funded from registration income only, never sponsored by a tool maker.
02
No product named in a competency
Capabilities are described so the Standard survives the next model release.
03
Assessors cannot examine their own trainees
Teaching and invigilation are separated at candidate level, audited by sampling.
04
Licence status carries no vote
Revenue from a territory has no bearing on the content of the Standard or a pass mark.
Public documents

What we publish, and when

Documents in preparation are listed with their status rather than hidden. Nothing here is behind a login.

DocumentStatusVersion · date
Charter of the Foundation
Objects, powers, and the limits on the Board.
Published
v1.0 · JUL 2026
Body of Knowledge — Standard v1.0
Six domains, competency statements with named authors.
Published
v1.0 · JUL 2026
Neutrality statement
Why no product is named in a competency.
Published
v1.0 · JUL 2026
Conflict-of-interest policy & register
Declarations per member, per term.
Published
v1.0 · JUL 2026
Terms of reference — Steering Council
Quorum, voting, dissent and publication.
With the Council
DRAFT 3 · JUL 2026
Examination & psychometrics policy
Item development, pass marks, comparability.
In preparation
EXPECTED Q4 2026
Complaints & appeals procedure
Panels, timelines, escalation to the Board.
In preparation
EXPECTED Q4 2026
Change note — Standard v1.1
Added, retired and re-weighted competencies.
In preparation
WITH v1.1
Superseded versions stay available in the archive. Document archive
Complaints & appeals

Every decision can be challenged

Assessment outcomes, accreditation decisions and registry entries are all appealable. An appeal is heard by a panel with no involvement in the original decision, and the outcome is reported to the Board in summary each quarter.

Serve on the Consortium

Nominate yourself, or a colleague

We are appointing chairs and members for Standard v1.1. Terms run three years, are unpaid, and are published with the version they shaped.